People is offering a sneak peek at their annual 100 Most Beautiful People, which hits shelves this Friday, and after seeing the results, you gotta wonder if the editors over there realize what a joke this thing has become. I mean other than 50+-year-old grandmas, who think anyone without saggy boobs, wrinkles, and cottage cheese legs is beautiful, no one takes this thing seriously anymore. There are only so many times that you can mix in the heinously ugly– Rumer Willis (that’s her photoged above in case you felt like turning to stone today), the slightly less unattractive– Mary J. Blige, and fire crotches– Julianne Moore, with the likes of Salma Hayek and Isla Fisher before people start to catch on and realize this is just some elaborate ploy to shove mediocrity down our throats in the hopes that we’ll all start to buy into stupid clichés like “it only matters how beautiful you are on the inside” and blah blah blah. I’m sorry, but if you claim to have found the 100 most beautiful people in the world, then at the very least I expect this thing to look a little bit more like FHM’s 100 Sexiest Women (I can’t comment on what guys should be on the list for obvious reasons) instead of the cast from The Swan.
But I guess the biggest question here is this– judging from the criteria they’re using over at People (whatever it is), how does Sarah Jessica Parker not claim the top spot every year?
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.